Monday, April 20, 2009

Nevada Solar One - Clearinghouse



This is a compilation of links and videos describing Nevada Solar One:


First is Acciona's advertisement announcing the opening of Nevada Solar One in 2007. Click here.


Click here for the Wikipedia Article


The Energy Blog's Nevada Solar One Photos, Write-Up, and Discussion


Click here or read below to review details the financing structure for Nevada Solar One

Structured Leveraged Concentrating Solar Power?

On August first, Acciona Energy closed financing on Nevada Solar One, in the first leveraged lease structured financing in the United States.

This begs two questions:

  1. What in the world is a leveraged lease structured financing?
  2. Why do we care?

What in the World?

An in-depth analysis of the economics of leverage leasing for all three parties involved is available here. Structured financing is a generic term for any form of financing more complex than a loan or a rental. For those of you who need to remain awake, here's the short version: a leveraged lease is a way of obtaining financing that allows the three parties (lenders, equity investors, and lessee) involved to parcel out the risks, tax benefits, and income streams in a way that suits each of their needs.

Why We Care

While using structured finance can lead to substantial financial benefits for the parties involved, the deal can only be done if the lenders believe that the cash flows from the underlying asset, in this case Nevada Solar One, a Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plant, are sufficiently reliable that they are willing to loan money in exchange for a share of those cash flows.

In other words, the lenders believe that Acciona (ACXIF.PK) will be able to operate the CSP plant with sufficient reliability to earn enough money to eventually pay off the $266 million they put up for the deal. The equity investors believe that the CSP plant will retain some value at the end of the lease, so they will not be left holding the bag.

The completing of a leveraged lease is implicit proof that all the financial institutions involved have a degree of confidence in CSP technology, which they would not have in a development stage technology. By their actions, lenders Spain-based Banco Santander and BBVA, and Portugal-based CAIXA Geral de Depositos and equity investors JPMorgan Capital Corp., Northern Trust (NTRS) and Wells Fargo (WFC), are all saying, "Concentrating Solar Power is a main-stream technology, and we are confident of its predictable operation for the lifetime of the lease." Just as important, they're putting their money where their mouths are.

When lenders believe in predictable cash flows, they reduce the interest rate they charge to finance a project, just as a mortgage company will charge a lower rate of interest to a married couple with steady jobs than they would to a single man who has never worked in his life (if he could obtain a loan at all.) A lower interest rate translates into a lower discount rate when calculating the Levelized Cost of Energy which a technology can produce.

With financial innovation, a group of Iberian and American financial institutions have reduced the cost of energy which will have to be paid by this plants and future CSP plants in the United States just as surely as any technical innovation would. Everyone who wants clean energy at affordable prices should care.

UPDATE: 9/13: In this article on CSP by Fortune/CNN columnist Marc Gunther, he quotes an executive at CSP developer Ausra, saying "As soon as we can build solar power projects with the same cost of capital as building conventional coal or natural gas plants, we'll deliver electricity at the same cost as coal." (emphasis mine.)

DISCLOSURE: Tom Konrad and/or his clients do not have positions in any of the companies mentioned here.

DISCLAIMER: The information and trades provided here are for informational purposes only and are not a solicitation to buy or sell any of these securities. Investing involves substantial risk and you should evaluate your own risk levels before you make any investment. Past results are not an indication of future performance. Please take the time to read the full disclaimer here.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Sempra Develops Nevada PV Project With First Solar


Sempra is sold on solar
Company expanding Nevada photovoltaic operations

By Onell R. Soto

STAFF WRITER

2:00 a.m. April 16, 2009
Sempra Energy unveiled its new solar facility, which uses thin-film technology, outside of Boulder City, Nev. Several measures are being taken to save money in building the facility. (Tiffany Brown / Las Vegas Sun) -
Jorge Uribe, a construction supervisor for the project, inspected solar panels at the Boulder City facility. (Sempra)

Jorge Uribe, a construction supervisor for the project, inspected solar panels at the Boulder City facility. (Sempra)

Sempra Energy says it has proven that it can inexpensively produce solar power and is greatly expanding its photovoltaic power operations in Nevada to supply customers in the Southwest.

“This project will provide the lowest-cost electricity from solar power ever delivered anywhere in the world,” Michael Allman, chief executive of subsidiary Sempra Generation, said yesterday in announcing a nearly five-fold increase in photovoltaic generation.

The San Diego company said that by the end of next year, it will complete construction of a 48-megawatt photovoltaic plant next to two other plants – a 10-megawatt solar facility and a 480-megawatt natural gas generator – that it owns in the desert.

He said the company wants to be the first to own more than 500 megawatts of solar generation. Engineers believe there is the potential for about 300 megawatts of solar next to the gas-fired Mesquite plant it runs west of Phoenix.

Sempra is also working on generating power using large wind turbines in northern Baja.

The Nevada solar plant, to be called Copper Mountain Solar, will power about 30,000 homes at peak production, the company said.

Allman wouldn't say how much the new solar plant will cost to build or how much the electricity it generates will cost. Electricity in California cost, on average, just under 13 cents a kilowatt-hour last year, the federal Energy Information Administration said.

First Solar of Tempe, Ariz., is expected to begin building the 380-acre plant this year. The 10-megawatt plant, which opened last year, took about six months to build.

Allman said costs are low because land is cheap, its nearly 830,000 solar panels will be installed assembly-line style and it is being built next to existing transmission lines. The plant will use thin-film technology, which produces less power per square inch, but is cheaper to manufacture.

The solar power will still be more expensive than the electricity generated by burning natural gas next door, Sempra said.

The company hasn't decided who will receive the power from the new 48-megawatt plant in Boulder City, Nev., about 40 miles southeast of Las Vegas.

It is talking with utilities in California, Nevada and Arizona, where government mandates are requiring that an ever-larger share of electricity comes from sources that don't burn fossil fuel.

Sempra also owns San Diego Gas & Electric, but the utility is operated independently from Sempra Generation. While SDG&E says it is looking to buy solar power, it's unclear whether it would make a deal with its sister company.

Such deals have to be done at arm's length through a bidding process, said SDG&E spokeswoman Jennifer Ramp.

To meet state mandates, SDG&E is counting on receiving 900 megawatts from Stirling Energy Systems of Phoenix. That company is working on a massive solar plant in Imperial County using solar-powered engines – a technology that has never been proven at large scale.

The utility is well behind meeting a state requirement that it get 20 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2010.

“SDG&E needs to get further down the renewable path,” said Mark Bachman, an analyst with Pacific Crest Securities, in San Francisco.

Pacific Gas & Electric in Northern California has a 20-year deal to purchase power from the 10-megawatt plant in Boulder City, where energy zoning has led to the development and planning of large solar plants.

On Tuesday night, Boulder City approved a lease of 1,000 acres to another company, NextLight, for a 100-megawatt photovoltaic plant.

And a Spanish-owned company, Acciona, operates a 68-megawatt solar plant that generates electricity by heating oil that then boils water to run a steam turbine.

In addition, much larger plants are in the works in California, including a 550-megawatt photovoltaic plant being planned for San Luis Obispo County. PG&E will buy power from that plant, also being built by First Solar.

Onell Soto: (619) 293-1280; onell.soto@uniontrib.com

In the Union-Tribune on Page C1

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Stimulus and the Effects on Renewable Energy Finance

March 20, 2009

Stimulus seen sowing seeds for renewable energy's revival

NEW YORK -- There are signs that the federal stimulus might be pumping a little life into the alternative-energy industry.

Financiers and law firms specializing in renewable energy say they see growing interest in reviving moribund projects and breaking ground on new deals. And while big banks that have braced the industry's backbone are still on the fence, some hedge funds and private equity and venture capital firms are cautiously looking to take advantage of stimulus provisions that temporarily eliminate the need for tax equity financing, which has long been a mainstay for renewable energy projects.

"Whether it's the stimulus package or the return of the banks, there is early evidence of a growing appetite for the types of small- to medium-sized projects that they sponsor," said Tucker Twitmyer, managing partner at the venture capital firm EnerTech Capital.

The stock markets are still no place to raise cash, but if activity from many nontraditional sources of financing lifts the cleantech sector faster, as many experts predict, that may encourage banks to ease their strict lending requirements and again lift renewable energy finance if credit markets start to normalize.

"I'd say it's a little bit like March in your garden," said John Gulliver, a specialist in renewable energy financing at the law firm Pierce Atwood. "There are some shoots of green coming up out of the frozen ground in the snow, but they're not ready to harvest yet."

There is some dispute among insiders as to which sectors are seeing the most benefits. Some are confident that solar energy companies are enjoying a big lift from the stimulus, while others observe signs that wind power is seeing more gains. Most assume that energy efficiency provisions in the law will see home and building weatherization fill up much of the activity, but analysts see opportunities for photovoltaic companies here, too.

But what is clear is that parts of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act that replace the need for tax credits are giving the industry its biggest boost.

Prior to the financial crash felt in the second half of 2008, most alternative energy projects owed their life to federal investment tax credits and production tax credits that allowed banks backing projects to offset tax liabilities against their investments in wind farms and solar plants.

The structure worked as long as the banks pulled profits, but with most financial institutions expected to post steep losses for 2009, tax credit finance has become all but obsolete.

According to figures from the private equity firm Hudson Clean Energy Partners, about 25 of the largest financial firms were active in tax equity financing for alternatives in 2007, the year most analysts see as the historic height of the cleantech market.

At least 16 of those firms left the field last year, including the permanent departures of Lehman Brothers, Wachovia, Merrill Lynch and American International Group (AIG). For 2009, Hudson Clean Energy counts six bank investors, although 12 could return if the tough financial climate stabilizes.

Congress getting credit

Signs of life in cleantech are mostly due to Congress allowing companies to opt for Treasury grants in lieu of investment tax credits, experts say.

Biomass, geothermal, solar and wind power project developers can now elect to use the investment tax credit to get a federal rebate for the amount of the tax equity money that would have backed their projects.

The advantage, Hudson Clean Energy managing partner Neil Auerbach says, is that the new structure is much simpler and more affordable than the old periodic tax credit schemes favored by Congress in the past. The Treasury grants significantly lower the cost of financing, an important component given the high cost of capital in today's economy.

"Instead of accessing the currency traders in the financial institutional community that charge tremendous transaction costs to access their tax capacity, instead you go to the federal government, specifically the Department of Treasury, and you hand in your tax credit and you get 100 cents on the dollar supposedly within 60 days of a satisfactory application," Auerbach explained in a conference call hosted by the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) on Wednesday.

Aside from the tax credit fix, new and better federal loan guarantees have considerably reduced the cost and risk of financing projects and are helping to lure jittery investors back into renewable energy.

Analysts expect that some of the $6 billion appropriated for loan guarantees will provide the foundation for at least $60 billion in new lending for clean energy projects over the next two years. The financial community is taking notice.

"I'm not saying they've jumped in, but we've gotten more phone calls, and there seems to be a greater degree of interest on the part of nontraditional equity investors, in which I would include things like hedge funds, private equity money, etc.," said Phillip Spector, an attorney specializing in energy and renewables at Troutman Sanders.

A possible stabilization of the fossil-fuel energy markets could also boost optimism and encourage even more firms to take advantage of the new government carrots.

Crude oil prices are now hovering around $50 a barrel. While the market may still see some price swings, many energy analysts theorize that oil prices have probably found a floor and will either stabilize at the $40 to $50 range or steadily rise over that mark in the coming months.

"There may be a perception that oil has bottomed out, and I think that will help if people get confident that they're not going to be competing in a $20 a barrel oil market but one that's $40 to $50 or $60," Gulliver said. "That changes the economics quite a bit."

Anticipating a renewable mandate

Cleantech watchers are also crediting the stimulus for funding several previously authorized measures to lift renewable energy in the United States, in particular programs managed under the Department of Energy that have existed for years but never received funding when Republicans dominated Washington.

But most DOE projects have yet to take effect as stimulus money gets pumped into the economy in pulses. Analysts say it is too soon to tell what impact those appropriations will have on the now stirring alternative energy and clean technology industries.

Insiders also report that, while signs of fresh activity are promising, investors with the most money to spend on cleantech are holding out for indications that forthcoming energy and transportation bills will provide more solid regulatory support for the industry.

While the stimulus is helping to prime the marketplace, there is much hope and anticipation that the federal government will establish a national renewable portfolio standard, or RPS, a mandate that the country generate a specific proportion of its energy needs from wind, solar, geothermal and other such sources. That, along with rules that place a price on a ton of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions, will do far more to stimulate cleantech than the law passed last month.

"Everybody is waiting for the next piece, which is the national RPS," said Peter Fusaro, founder of Global Change Associates and organizer of the upcoming Wall Street Green Trading Summit. "The market is going to track legislation. And we're going to get all that next month, hopefully."

Fusaro also expects the industry to get another big lift should Washington adopt a national utility earnings "decoupling" program along the lines of a successful California initiative. Decoupling eliminates the paradox whereby utilities that promote greater energy efficiency see profits fall as demand for their power decreases, establishing structures that guarantee that energy generators can retain their expected earnings.

Ultimately, banks are key

But experts say the renewable energy industry will only return to its heyday once the major banks final loosen up credit and re-enter the fray.

While an important part of the picture, venture capital and private equity investors have nowhere near the amount of capital needed to fuel the industry on the scale that the new leadership in Washington is hoping.

For the Obama administration to meet its goal of doubling renewable energy generation by 2011, Hudson Clean Energy estimates that about $134 billion in new capital investments will be required by then. To reach a 10 percent penetration of renewables in the nation's energy mix by 2012, as President Obama has proposed, about $217 billion will be needed.

The most important remaining impediment to cleantech investing "is the banks not lending," Fusaro said. "We need the capital markets moving again."

The large-scale wind and solar projects of the sort that moved along before the economic crash can get a lift from nontraditional sources of finance, but they almost all still need heavy debt financing to help see them to completion.

While the renewed interest in renewables is promising, the industry won't experience a real breath of life until the banks relax and open up their tight wallets again.

"It's too early to call it spring with the daffodils and tulips up," finance specialist Gulliver said, "but I think you can see signs of green poking up underneath the earth, so that's good."

Copyright 2009 E&E Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

For more news on energy and the environment, visit www.greenwire.com.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Update on Tax-equity Markets

by Cassandra Sweet Dow Jones Newswires
Wednesday, March 04, 2009
SAN FRANCISCO (Dow Jones)

The financial crisis has opened a void in financing for renewable-energy projects as troubled investment banks have pulled back.

The situation has left developers scrambling for funds and eyeing new ideas to fix the broken system.

Some banks, funds and utilities are expected to step up their investment in renewable-energy projects, which had been dominated by big participants like Bank of America Corp. (BAC), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Morgan Stanley (MS). But money hasn't come fast enough for many developers of wind, solar and other clean-energy projects.

Lending was fluid when the banks had large balance sheets and could make use of a 30% renewable energy investment tax credit. The banks would invest in clean-energy projects in exchange for the developing company's tax credit and a related tax write-off called accelerated depreciation. But as losses have mounted, the big investment banks still standing have cut back on their tax-equity financing.

"There have been no unconventional additions to the tax-equity market," said Nick Allen, an equities analyst at Morgan Stanley (MS) in San Francisco. "No one has stepped in and provided funding yet. We hope something will change."

This has left many renewable-energy companies struggling and prompted market participants to pitch new ideas to the federal government to fix the system, even as the Obama administration promises a flood of money in the hope of kick-starting investment in a sector seen key to rejuvenating the economy and weaning the country off fossil fuels.

Tough Choices For Developers; Fixes Pitched

The strains from the collapse of the tax-equity market are starting to show.

Privately held thin-film solar panel maker OptiSolar this week sold its entire portfolio of planned solar power plants, about 1,850 megawatts, to leading thin-film solar panel maker and developer First Solar Inc. (FSLR) for $400 million in stock.

In a similar move, eSolar last month sold off its pipeline of solar-thermal power plants to independent power producer NRG Energy Inc. (NRG) for a $10 million equity investment and a promise by NRG to develop the plants.

Meanwhile, eSolar competitor Ausra, also privately held, said in late January it was abandoning plans to develop and own large-scale solar plants to focus instead on selling its technology to others.

To spur repairs to the system and jump-start investment, market participants like brokerage Meridian Investments Inc., which pegs the value of the renewable energy tax-credit market at $6.5 billion to $9 billion a year, are pitching proposed fixes to the federal government.

Meridian is shopping a tax-credit financing proposal in Washington that the firm says could attract as much as $3 billion in renewable energy investments from Fortune 500 companies this year.

Under the proposal, an investing company would borrow money directly from the Treasury Department at a 10-year Treasury note rate. The company wouldn't make any payments for the first five years, and would pay off the note in the second five years, when the note would fully amortize, said Jack Casey, the firm's vice chairman in Washington.

"We think this is the best way to do it," said Casey, whose firm has placed about $15 billion in tax-credit equity financing over the last 28 years. "It's no handout, it's just timing and credit."

Meridian's investor-note financing proposal would boost the yield on such transactions from about 8% currently, to as much as 14%, Casey said, adding several large companies, including utilities and non-energy firms, have expressed interest in the plan. The firm hopes to speak with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner this month about the proposal, which would include tax credits for investments in low-income housing and historical restoration projects.

Opportunities Emerging?

The pullback by the big investment banking houses also may be creating opportunities for regional banks to expand their role in renewable-energy investment. Banks with experience in affordable-housing tax credits and new-markets tax credits for developing retail and other commercial operations in low-income areas may be especially well placed.

"There's a lot of talk about who's going to fill the void," said Russ Landon, managing director of investment banking at Canaccord Adams in Boston, which helps put financing deals together and provides research on public companies. "I think you'll see some of the regional (banks) come in and do it if they have money."

Minneapolis-based U.S. Bancorp (USB) has invested in about a dozen renewable energy projects over the last year by providing tax-equity financing, and the company said it will likely expand its investing in renewables, drawn in part by government incentives in the economic-stimulus bill passed last month.

"We're interested in growing our presence in that space, from the project finance side and the tax-equity side," said Zack Boyers, chairman and chief executive of U.S. Bancorp's Community Development Corporation in St. Louis, the unit that makes the investments. He added that the bank has received numerous inquiries from renewable-energy developers in recent weeks.

Meanwhile, California's Union Bank just closed on $20 million in project financing for SunEdison, a Beltsville, Md.-based solar-panel installer backed by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), Allco Finance Group Ltd. and other investors. The bank has invested in about 17 projects over the last five years, with about nine of those deals done in the last six months, said Lance Markowitz, senior vice president at Union Bank.

"Given the impetus from the government, there are a lot of people working on a lot of projects," Markowitz said. "We're hoping to do more."

(Cassandra Sweet covers power, natural gas, renewable energy and carbon markets for Dow Jones Newswires.)

Copyright (c) 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.